Restoring vs Creating a Pond: Which Delivers Better Biodiversity Outcomes?

Balancing biodiversity benefit with maintenance, safety and responsibility

For many town, parish, and community councils, ponds are often the first biodiversity project discussed. They are visible, well understood by the public, and strongly associated with wildlife benefit. But when a council decides to “do something for biodiversity”, an important question is often overlooked:

Is it better to restore an existing pond, or to create a new one?

The answer is not always obvious — and the decision has implications for biodiversity outcomes, cost, governance, and long-term responsibility.

Why Ponds Matter for Councils

Ponds are among the most biodiverse habitats in the UK. Even small water bodies can support amphibians, invertebrates, birds, and aquatic plants, while contributing to wider ecological networks.

For councils, ponds also offer:

• Highly visible biodiversity action

• Opportunities for community engagement

• Alignment with Biodiversity Action Plans (BAPs)

• Potential links to education and wellbeing

  
  

However, the route taken to deliver a pond matters just as much as the outcome.

Restoring an Existing Pond: Often the Stronger Starting Point

Many council areas already contain ponds — sometimes forgotten, overgrown, silted, or partially dry. These may exist on council-owned land, in cemeteries, parks, or older green spaces.

Biodiversity Benefits

Restoring an existing pond often delivers faster and more reliable biodiversity gains. Even degraded ponds frequently retain seed banks, dormant eggs, and ecological memory that allow wildlife to return quickly once conditions improve.

Restoration can:

• Re-establish historic habitats

• Support species already present locally

• Strengthen existing ecological networks

Practical Advantages for Councils

From a governance perspective, restoration often involves:

• Lower capital costs than full creation

• Fewer planning and land-use complications

• Clearer justification within a BAP

• Reduced uncertainty around hydrology

  
  

Things Councils Must Consider

Restoration still requires careful planning. Councils should consider:

• Ownership and long-term responsibility

• Timing of works to avoid ecological harm

• Sediment removal and disposal

• Ongoing maintenance commitments

  
  

Restoration is not “doing nothing” — it is a managed intervention that must be properly scoped and recorded.

Creating a New Pond: Opportunity with Added Complexity

Creating a new pond can be the right choice where no suitable ponds exist, or where strategic gaps in habitat connectivity have been identified.

Biodiversity Benefits

New ponds can:

• Create habitat in previously poor areas

• Support targeted species if designed correctly

• Contribute to wider biodiversity strategies

  
  

However, biodiversity benefits often take longer to establish, and outcomes are less predictable than restoration.

Practical Challenges for Councils

New pond creation introduces additional considerations:

• Site selection and land ownership

• Ground conditions and water supply

• Health and safety and public access

• Higher upfront costs

  
  

New ponds also carry greater long-term liability, particularly in publicly accessible spaces.

Common Risks

Councils sometimes underestimate:

• Maintenance requirements after installation

• Community concerns around safety or appearance

• The risk of ponds drying out or becoming poor-quality habitats

  
  

Without a clear maintenance and monitoring plan, new ponds can quickly become a governance burden rather than a biodiversity success.

So Which Delivers Better Outcomes?

In many cases, restoring an existing pond delivers better biodiversity outcomes more quickly, at lower risk and cost. It also aligns well with the principle of making best use of existing natural assets.

That said, new pond creation can be appropriate where:

• There is no existing pond to restore

• The site is strategically important

• Long-term maintenance is secured

• The project sits within a wider biodiversity framework

  
  

The key is not choosing what looks most ambitious, but what is most deliverable and defensible.

The Governance Question Councils Should Ask First

Before deciding to restore or create a pond, councils should ask:

• Who owns the land and who will maintain the pond long-term?

• How does this project fit within our Biodiversity Action Plan?

• What risks (financial, legal, reputational) are we taking on?

• How will we evidence success and compliance?

  
  

Answering these questions early avoids well-intentioned projects becoming unmanaged liabilities.

From Project to Strategy

Ponds work best when they are:

• Part of a wider biodiversity strategy

• Linked to hedgerows, wildflower areas, or green corridors

• Properly recorded and reviewed over time

  
  

Whether restoring or creating, the goal is not just a pond — it is measurable, sustainable biodiversity gain.

At Green Council, we work with councils to move from individual projects to structured, confident biodiversity governance — ensuring decisions are informed, proportionate, and aligned with statutory duties.

Contact Us